top of page

ChatGPT is to us what academics have been to the ruling elites

In today's world, we have access to a tool that is reminiscent of the academic slaves or assistants that many famous philosophers had – the Artificial Intelligence (AI). ChatGPT, a language model trained on a large dataset of human knowledge, is an example of such a tool. It is capable of generating responses to a wide variety of queries, from philosophical questions to everyday conversations.

Like the academic slaves of ancient times, ChatGPT is always ready to perform at our will. With a simple prompt, it can produce responses that are informed by a vast array of knowledge, spanning centuries and disciplines. And, like the slaves of Plato, ChatGPT can read works by Parmenides, Aeschyllus, or any other author we may desire.

Moreover, the process by which philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, and Cicero produced their works is not unlike the way we use ChatGPT today. Plato wrote his dialogues with the assistance of his students, and Aristotle wanted Alexander Magnus to bring him philosophers from India. Similarly, when we use ChatGPT, we are relying on the knowledge of others who have contributed to its vast dataset.

But, as with the academic slaves of the past, there are ethical concerns about the use of AI like ChatGPT. Just as the use of slaves in academia was a reflection of the inequalities of ancient society, the use of AI raises questions about the distribution of knowledge and power in our own society. Who has access to ChatGPT, and who benefits from its use? Are some voices privileged over others in the creation of the dataset that ChatGPT relies on?

Furthermore, the use of ChatGPT raises questions about the nature of knowledge itself. As modern philosophers have long recognized, knowledge is not simply a matter of collecting information but also of constructing arguments. ChatGPT may be capable of providing information, but it is not capable of constructing arguments or making judgments about the validity of claims.

In conclusion, the use of AI like ChatGPT raises important questions about the nature of knowledge and the ethics of its acquisition. Like the academic slaves of the past, ChatGPT is a tool that can provide us with access to vast amounts of knowledge. But we must be mindful of the ethical implications of its use and the limitations of the information it provides. Ultimately, it is up to us to use AI like ChatGPT responsibly and to consider its place in the broader landscape of knowledge acquisition.

bottom of page